Bibliometrics as an essential tool in scientific research: exploring its importance and applications
Keywords:
bibliometrics, scientific research, impact, bibliometric metrics, evaluationAbstract
Bibliography as discipline has gained relevance in the field of scientific research. The paper examines in detail the importance of bibliometrics as an important tool for scientific research, analyzing its various applications and contributions to the development of knowledge in various fields of different sciences, thus examining how bibliometrics facilitates the evaluation of impact and visibility. . of scientific research, as well as the various indicators and bibliometric methods used to measure the productivity and quality of scientific products. The challenges and limitations associated with the use of bibliometrics in research evaluation are also critically analyzed in order to promote a more reflective and equitable use of this tool in the field of study. Bibliometrics provides an objective way to measure research impact, identify emerging trends, and increase transparency within the research community. However, it faces challenges such as bias and lack of standardization that must be addressed to ensure effective and appropriate use. The purpose of this article is to promote a better understanding of bibliometrics and its role in scientific research, as well as to promote an informed debate about its uses and implications in academia. We hope that this analysis will encourage a more thoughtful and critical use of bibliometrics, facilitating fairer and more accurate assessments of research impact and quality, which will benefit the entire academic community.
Downloads
References
Bornmann, L., & Haunschild, R. (2018). Alternative metrics in scientometrics: A meta-analysis of research into three altmetrics. Scientometrics, 116(3), 1255-1281.
Chen, S., Wang, Y., & Li, S. (2019). Bibliometric analysis and visualization of medical big data research. PeerJ, 7, e6527.
García, A., & Martínez, B. (2020). Bibliometric analysis of research on sustainability in tourism. Sustainability, 12(3), 1086.
Gómez, J. M. (2018). Bibliometric analysis of research on artificial intelligence applications in medicine. Journal of Medical Systems, 42(12), 242.
Hicks, D. (2012). Performance-based funding for research through competitive grants drives effective investment strategies in Australia. Research Evaluation, 21(3), 213-223.
Hirsch, J. E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102(46), 16569-16572.
Ioannidis, J. P. (2005). Why most published research findings are false. PLoS Medicine, 2(8), e124.
Jones, R., Smith, T., & Brown, L. (2017). Co-authorship networks and research impact: A bibliometric analysis of Australian Research Council Discovery Projects. PLoS ONE, 12(11), e0187288.
Larivière, V., Sugimoto, C. R., & Cronin, B. (2012). A bibliometric chronicling of library and information science's first hundred years. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 63(5), 997-1016.
López, R., & Martínez, S. (2021). El papel de la bibliometría en la evaluación de la investigación científica: Perspectivas y desafíos. Revista de Ciencia y Tecnología, 15(3), 78-94.
Martínez, M. A., & Herrera, M. (2015). Bibliometría: una herramienta útil para la gestión del conocimiento en la universidad. El profesional de la información, 24(6), 785-794.
Rousseau, R. (2014). Bibliometrics and citation analysis: From the science citation index to cybermetrics. Lanham, MD: Scarecrow Press.
Smith, A., & Johnson, L. (2016). Bibliometric analysis of research productivity in neuroscience from China, Japan, and South Korea. Neurology Asia, 21(2), 167-175.
Smith, J. (2018). Bibliometría: conceptos y aplicaciones. Editorial Académica.
Waltman, L., & van Eck, N. J. (2015). Field-normalized citation impact indicators and the choice of an appropriate counting method. Journal of Informetrics, 9(4), 872-894.
Wilsdon, J., Allen, L., Belfiore, E., Campbell, P., Curry, S., Hill, S., ... & Johnson, B. (2015). The Metric Tide: Report of the Independent Review of the Role of Metrics in Research Assessment and Management. doi: 10.13140/RG.2.1.4929.1363
